Sunday, 29 July 2018

MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES BEGS NEPAL TO LIFT ITS BAN ON NEPALI WORKERS COMING TO WORK IN MALAYSIA

Malaysia's Human Resources Minister M. Kulasegaran had earlier announced that Malaysian eateries would have to hire Malaysian cooks only from 1 January 2019 but following protests by associations of restaurant owners, he somewhat backed off from his supposedly from his hardline stand.

Well now the recently elected government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal (a.k.a. Nepal), led by the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist), had barred Nepalese workers from coming to Malaysia to work because Nepal was unhappy "with restrictive Malaysian immigration requirements for its workers before they can be employed. This includes going through a private company "monopoly" for security and medical check-ups as part of the visa requirement", The Star reported.

It's rather strange that Malaysia's recently elected Pakatan Harapan government had not moved sooner to undo this legacy of previous governments, whereby one private company handles security and medical checkups of Nepali workers wanting to work in Malaysia but I suppose that is the drawback of dealing with such long-entrenched legacies from past governments according to the rule of law.

Malaysian industry desperately needs such workers to do so-called "dirty, demeaning and dangerous" jobs. which unemployed Malaysian graduates,including IT graduates, shy way from doing - preferring to drive taxis for a living instead.

So the good Human Resources Minister, has quite literally begged the Nepal government to reverse its ban.

The Star of 28 July 2018 reports:-

thestar.com.my

Kulasegaran asks Nepal to ease ban on workers to Malaysia while solution worked out - Nation

by allison lai

IPOH: The Human Resources Minister has called on the government of Nepal to go easy on the barring of its workers from coming to Malaysia.

M. Kulasegaran said that many industries here are dependent on foreign workers.

''We will try to find other mechanisms for their workers to come here. Otherwise there will be a severe shortage of workers in our country, leading to setbacks in progress.

''Nepalese workers are well-known for their bravery and honesty, and many Malaysian employers prefer to hire them.

''We hope that in the meantime, Nepal will go easy on the matter and reconsider (their decision),'' he told the press, after closing the national-level Workplace Accident Free Week at the Malay-Sino Chemical Industries Sdn Bhd here Saturday (July 28).

It was reported in The Star today that the government of Nepal has barred its workers from coming to Malaysia with immediate effect because it was unhappy with "restrictive" Malaysian immigration requirements for its workers before they can be employed.

This includes going through a private company "monopoly" for security and medical check-ups as part of the visa requirement.

Kulasegaran said that he was aware of the problems in hiring foreign workers involving a third-party company and the high charges imposed.

''All these (problems) were approved during the previous (Barisan Nasional) government and we are looking into how to overcome this.

''In fact, the Cabinet had discussed this matter earlier and I will prepare a paper in the coming week to call for immediate action,'' he said.

Kulasegaran also noted the Government has been engaging Nepalese government officials in the last two weeks to resolve the matter.

''I will contact the (Nepalese) High Commissioner on Monday,'' he said, adding that the Government would restore the system of hiring foreign workers back to the G2G (government-to-government) approach without any middlemen.


Also earlier on 28 July 2018, The Star reported in greater detail about the issues which Nepali workers and the Nepal government are unhappy about:-

thestar.com.my

Foreign Workers: Nepal slams the door, unhappy with company monopoly - Nation

by elan perumal

PETALING JAYA: The government of Nepal has barred its workers from coming to Malaysia with immediate effect.

The move comes as the Nepalese government expressed its unhappiness with "restrictive" immigration requirements its workers faced before they can be gainfully employed in this country. This includes having to go through a private company for security and medical check-ups as part of the visa requirement.

Nepal Embassy labour attache Sanmaya Ramtel confirmed that her government has indefinitely barred its citizens from seeking employment in Malaysia. The official told The Star that the government had identified several discrepancies in the recruitment process of migrant workers in Malaysia.

"The Nepalese government does not understand why the Malaysian Government is allowing a private company to monopolise the recruitment process.

"The government also feels that the company's presence is a virtual monopoly as other companies are not allowed to carry out the screening and this contributes to higher cost for the workers," she said.

Malaysia, the official said, was among the top two destinations for Nepalese migrant workers seeking job opportunities outside their country.

Furthermore, she said, the Gurkas from Nepal were the only category of foreign workers sought by Malaysia to work in the security line.

"This has been a long-standing dispute between the Nepalese and Malaysian governments.

"However, the change of government in Nepal which took place in February this year saw the new government taking a firm stand on the matter," Sanmaya said.

A source from the recruitment industry told The Star that employers are now having difficulty hiring Nepali workers.

The source said the issue was over the involvement of Bestinet Sdn Bhd, which is the sole party that carries out bio-medical screening for migrant workers entering Malaysia.

It is learnt that there are currently more than 500,000 Nepalese workers in Malaysia. About 150,000 of them are hired as security guards, while the rest are involved in construction and manufacturing.

After Indonesia, Nepal is also the main supplier of migrant workers to Malaysia.

Onlinekhabar, a Nepalese news portal, reported that the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security would not stop workers who are at the final stages of obtaining labour permits from flying to Malaysia.

Chirara Kannan, the owner of a consultancy service for employers, said Nepalese workers had stopped coming to Malaysia because of their government's stand against the Malaysian Government's policy which required migrant workers to go through Bestinet.

"The decision means migrant workers from Nepal cannot be hired by Malaysian employers since our government has endorsed Bestinet," he said.

"Without bio-medical screening – a prerequisite for foreign workers – foreigners cannot be employed in Malaysia," he said.

Chirara, however, said the Nepalese government felt that medical screening could be done without Bestinet.

"They feel Bestinet is a company created to monopolise the industry," he added.

An employer who declined to be identified said the situation had affected him badly because he had exhausted the quota to bring in workers from other countries including Bangladesh and India.

He said he had about 3,000 foreign workers in his factories and required about 1,000 more foreign workers.

"I have sufficient quota to hire Nepalese workers but am unable to do so due to the Nepalese government's stand," he said.

He added that the demand for Nepalese workers was also due to their good work ethics reputation.

This new development comes after The Star reported in June that Bangladeshi workers were forced to pay exorbitant amounts of money to their agents, including a syndicate which is linked to a Bangladeshi businessman with a Datuk Seri title, who is residing in Malaysia.

In an immediate response, a Bestinet spokesman said that there were 37 medical centres in Nepal accredited to perform the bio-medical screening.

These were identified, audited and selected based on their capabilities and medical facilities available, which allow medical results to be integrated and uploaded to the system in real time to the respective stakeholders (ie Malaysian Em­­bassy, Malaysian Immigration and Employers) as a compliance requirement before approvals are given.

"Such requirements are important to ensure the medical results are examined by medical practitioners following Malaysian requirements.

"Bestinet only collects RM100 for the bio-medical system which was approved by the Government, and other charges are collected by other service providers.

"We would like to state that ISC (Immigration Security Clearance), VLN (Visa Luar Negara), OSC (One Stop Centre) services are not provided by Bestinet and Bestinet is not related to the providers of these services and any Kathmandu-based agents," the spokesman said.

He added that the company welcomed the Government's intent to set up a committee to conduct a thorough review into all systems and service providers related to the recruitment and management of foreign workers.


Well, let us see how soon the Malaysian government will resolve this issue and revert to hiring of Nepali workers in Malaysia on a government-to-government basis, whilst cutting out middlemen.

And, Heck! With Malaysia's very much touted e-government over all these years and all the talk about the adoption of Enterprise Architecture-based framework, protocols and policies (1GovEA) across the information systems, business processes, work and operational culture across all Malaysian government Ministries, departments and agencies, it should be just as easy as filing their tax return, for intending Malaysian employers to apply for permission to hire foreign workers and for their work permits online and transparently through the e-government system.

Perhaps "1GovEA" sounds too "Najib Era", so the Pakatan government may want to change it to "2GovEA".

However, remember that the Roman Empire declined and fell because Roman citizens became too comfortable and lazy, and increasingly relied on foreign workers - well slaves brought from vassal states across the empire, whilst the Romans indulged themselves in entertainment such as spectator sports such as watching fights to the death by gladiators in arenas, wining and dining their lives away.

Whilst Malaysia no longer has chattel slaves, however we have become increasingly dependent on foreign workers - i.e. indentured wage slaves to do things for us, whilst Malaysians go around, faces buried in their smartphones all day or watching mindless wrestling matches, soccer and mindless American action movies on large screen TVs in 24-hour eateries, including those which wash their dishes with toilet bowl water.

This is our road to decadence and decline.

Yours truly

POLITISCHEISS

Wednesday, 25 July 2018

SO DOES MALAYSIA HAVE A DYSFUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY?

Following the 2008 general elections, some prominent political bloggers got elected as members of parliament and the media showed them blogging from their seats in parliament.

However, now we have a situation where elected members of parliament, including some cabinet ministers and their deputy ministers don't attend parliament, to the extent that parliament could not proceed for a while due to lack of quorum.

I suppose Malaysian voted for a dysfunctional democracy on 9th May 2018, whilst:-

The ringgit continues to depreciate against the U.S. dollar
https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=MYR&view=1Y

Relations between Malaysia and Singapore are expected to cool. "The research house expects Mahathir’s administration to be more confrontational towards Singapore, marking a shift in relations, which had been friendly under the leadership of Malaysia’s previous prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak." https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/07/25/malaysia-singapore-ties-expected-to-cool-in-near-future/

The Statistics Department has predicted that growth in Malaysia's economy is expected to slow down over the next few months.
"KUALA LUMPUR (July 23): The Statistics Department has cautioned that Malaysia’s economy is expected to grow slower in the next four to six months, between September and November."
http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/msia-economy-contract-between-sept-and-nov-says-stats-dept

Nett foreign funds inflow into the Bursa Malaysia - i.e. the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange throught most of 2017
https://www.malaysiastock.biz/Market-Statistic.aspx?m=2017

...turned into a nett outflow of foreign funds after the 9th May 2018 general elections
https://www.malaysiastock.biz/Market-Statistic.aspx?m=2018

..and a nett weekly outflow of foreign funds each week over the past eight weeks
https://www.malaysiastock.biz/Market-Statistic.aspx?m=w

..and a nett daily outflow of foreign funds from Bursa Malaysia in six out of the past seven days.
https://www.malaysiastock.biz/Market-Statistic.aspx?m=d

Bloomberg seems to believe that Malaysia stands to lose a lot in terms of trade, investments, tourism, the Malaysia my second home programme and property sales by suspending further construction of the East Coast Rail Link.
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/07/25/malaysias-problem-how-to-cut-a-better-economic-deal-with-china/

Meanwhile, Malaysia wants to have a women-friendly sports complex in three years.
https://www.malaymail.com/s/1655793/malaysia-to-have-women-friendly-sports-complex-in-three-years-minister-says

Meanwhile, crowdfunding from generous Malaysians concerned over Malaysia's supposed RM1 trillion debt have donated a total of RM10 million into the Tabung Harapan (Fund of Hope) to help Malaysia pay off the debt.
https://www.malaymail.com/s/1655836/Finance-Ministry-says-over-RM10m-for-Tabung-Harapan-from-donors-abroad

It looks like Malaysia is pretty screwed right now but we voted for it, so have to live with it.

Anyway, The Star's report on Wednesday 25th July 2018 follows below.

thestar.com.my

Many MPs missing in action - Nation


3-4 minutes
KUALA LUMPUR: They worked long and hard during an often intense 14th General Election campaign to win seats in the Dewan Rakyat, yet some MPs are apparently finding it a challenge to attend the daily meetings in the august House. And it is only the second day of the second week of the new Parliament.

A day after the Prime Minister expressed dissatisfaction over the attendance of ministers and their deputies in Parliament, the Dewan Rakyat was forced to halt proceedings temporarily yesterday due to a lack of quorum.

Although the delay only lasted several minutes, it was widely shared on social media.

Some people were dismayed by the episode, while others were willing to accept that some of the MPs could have been very busy with other responsibilities, including their jobs in the ministries.

Dewan Rakyat Speaker Datuk Mohamad Arrif Md Yusof had ordered the House to stand down after Datuk Alexander Nanta Linggi (PBB-Kapit) noted that there was not enough MPs present.

“There are no ministers or deputy ministers in the House, so can we proceed as there is a lack of quorum?” Alexander asked when the House resumed at 2.30pm after the lunch break.

Mohamad Ariff took note of the Sarawak MP’s observation and stopped proceedings. The bell was rung for two minutes to prompt lawmakers elsewhere in the Parliament building to enter the Dewan.

The proceedings resumed after Mohamad Ariff announced that there were 35 MPs in the hall.

Poor turnout: Photos posted on Twitter by Annuar showing a nearly empty Dewan Rakyat.

Poor turnout: Photos posted on Twitter by Annuar showing a nearly empty Dewan Rakyat.


Under Standing Orders 13, there must be at least 26 MPs in the 222-seat Dewan to allow proceedings to be held.

It is understood that some MPs had attended the funeral of Bala­kong assemblyman Eddie Ng yesterday.

Pictures tweeted by Tan Sri Ann­uar Musa (BN-Ketereh) at various times showed an almost empty hall.

On Monday, Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had exp­ressed his dissatisfaction over the attendance of his Cabinet members and their deputies in Parliament.

He said ministers and deputy ministers should improve on their attendance records or have valid reasons if they cannot make it.

Last week, Khairy Jamaluddin (BN-Rembau) also questioned why the Government’s front bench was empty during the motion of thanks on the Royal Address.

“Not even a single Cabinet Min­ister in the Dewan Rakyat to listen to the Opposition leader’s speech,” the Rembau MP had tweeted.

Facebook user Afiq Ghazali said the ministers were working hard as the country’s debt was RM1 trillion.

But another user, Iskandar Suw, pointed out that not all MPs had ministerial duties.

“Other MPs should put their commitment in Parliament and bring the rakyat’s issues there,” he said.

Jasper Dasper suggested that allowances of absent MPs be cut and demerit points be given for “absence without solid reasons”.

Former minister Tan Sri Rais Yatim shared a similar view in a tweet, adding that another measure could be the publication of the names of “lazy” MPs in newspapers or on social media.

https://www.thestar.com.my/new
Yours trully

Politischeiss
http://politischeiss.blogspot.com/



s/nation/2018/07/25/many-mps-missing-in-action-social-media-abuzz-after-lack-of-quorum-leads-to-dewan-rakyat-delay/


Saturday, 21 July 2018

FOR ONCE I CAN AGREE WITH WAN SAIFUL WAN JAN ON NGOs BEING IN THEIR BANGSAR BUBBLE

I have never been a fan of Wan Saiful Wan Jan, founder the neo-liberal think tank, the Institute of Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) and its chief executive officer (CEO) until he stepped down to become a politician shortly before Malaysia's last general elections in May 2018.

Neo-liberal capitalism, globalisation, open borders and privatisation has had its most damaging and exploitative effects on the working class in countries around the world and has only enabled giant corporations in the U.S. and imperialist western nations to buy up and gain control of the economies of economically and technologically weaker, less developed nations, especially in Asia, Africa and Latin America, as well as in Eastern and Southern Europe - taking over their public utilities, telecommunication utilities, railways, banks, resources and so forth, whilst preaching "democracy". "individual freedom", "free press", "free speech", "human rights" and so forth, in what is be SUGAR-COATED NEO-COLONIALISM WITH A SMILING FACE.

Many amongst the educated, English-literate, quite often overseas educated, urban, generally pro-Pakatan Harapan middle class looked upon the neo-liberal IDEAS and Wan Saiful Wan Jan as if he were Moses, having descendeth from the mountain, tablets with divine inscriptions in hand.

However, on this occasion,  Wan Saiful Wan Jan is saying what I have oftentimes said about the various pro-Pakatan or anti-BN non governmental organisations (NGOs), about Pakatan Rakyat and now Pakatan Harapan parties, especially DAP and PKR, whose support base is primarily amongst the educated, English-literate, quite often overseas educated, urban middle-class.

In his article below, Wan Saiful Wan Jan criticises his own cohorts at an event hosted by the non-profit G25 at the  exclusive Bukit Kiara Equestrian & Country Club in Kuala Lumpur, that they should get out of what he calls their Bangsar Bubble - an echo chamber in which the converted preach to the converted, and to roll up their sleeves and come down into the real world to connect with and put their message across to poor people in the remote areas or the lower income working poor in places such as Kerinchi in Kuala Lumpur and to try and understand their problems.

So on this occasion - kudos to you, Wan Saiful Wan Jan, for saying what I had been saying all along about why Pakatan politicians have never been able to swing the rural and low income urban vote behind them, then blame 40,000 Bangladeshis being flown in on 100 Boeing 747's to illegally vote for BN in the 2013 general elections.

In the run up to the 2018 general elections some commentator on social media claimed that an Antonov 225 cargo aircraft which landed in KLIA was there to fly in 40,000 Bangladeshis to illegally vote for BN. Whilst being the largest aircraft in the world today, with a maximum payload of 551,150 pounds (249.997 kilogrammes), each Bangladeshi would have had to have weighed 6.249 kilogrammes - the weight of a newly born baby.

So if that Antonov 225 were to fly in 40,000 Bangladeshis to illegally vote for BN, those 40,000 voters would have had to be 40,000 newly born Bangladeshi babies.

Now do you see how ignorant and mentally lazy social media "politicians" are - with their faces buried in their smartphones with no initiative to question what they receive on their smartphones and to do some research into the validity of the information they receive.

"They did it in the last general elections" - I hear you say.

Yes Pakatan got enough votes of rural and urban lower income voters to win the seats because Tun Dr. Mahathir, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yasin and their Pribumi party became a part of the Pakatan Harapan pact and brought along the votes of their loyalists amongst rural and lower income urban voters who in earlier elections had voted for UMNO/BN.

Take a look at the proportion of votes received by the winning candidate of parliamentary seats in Selangor state and you can see that Muslimin Yahaya of Pakatan pact party PKR won Sungai Besar with 36.5% of the votes, just 1.5 percentage points more than the nearest rival Budiman Mohd Zohdi (BN - UMNO) who got 34.1% of the votes - in a three-cornered contest with Mohamed Salleh M Husin of PAS which came a distant third with 14.8% of the vote in Sungai Besar - a ethnic Malay-majority constituency with 68.71% Malay population.

The parliamentary seat of Sabak Bernam in Selangor is a constituency which is 83.05% ethnic Malay and which has been won by the Alliance (the BN's predecessor) and by the BN since independence and in one-to-one contests between UMNO/BN and PKR/Pakatan and PKR's predecessor Keadilan. UMNO/BN consistently won Sabak Bernam with majorities ranging from 51.98% to as high as 61.99%. In the 2013 general elections UMNO/BN won Sabak Bernam with a majority of 53.04% in  one-on-one contest against PKR.

In a three cornered fight between UMNO/BN, Pribumi (Mahathir's party) and PAS (Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party), UMNO/BN held Sabak Bernam with 31.5% of the vote, Pribumi got 27.4% of the vote and PAS 22.8%, in short UMNO/BN won Sabak Bernam with the largest minority of votes in the May 2018 general elections whilst it had won Sabak Bernam with over 51% of the votes in two-cornered fights in previous general elections since independence.

In the 2013 general elections, PAS was part of the Pakatan Rakyat pact, the predecessor of Pakatan Harapan today, but in the 2018 general elections, PAS was on its own and not part of Pakatan Harapan, whilst Pribumi and Amanah (a PAS breakway) are members.

So the respective results of  voting in Sabak Bernam in the 2018 general elections reveal the extent of support PAS still has there as well as the extent of support for Mahathir and his party there and the split between the Mahathir loyalists within UMNO and remaining UMNO loyalists. Amanah supporters would have voted for Pribumi because it is part of the same Paktan Harapan pact as Amanah and whilst UMNO/BN held Sabak Bernam despite all that by a 4.1 percentage points margin, all the effects of three or more way contests.

The results of votes in Sungai Besar in 2018 show how fragile the wafer-thin margin of 1.1 percentage points in PKR/Pakatan's favour could be lost in the next general elections if the vote in Sungai Besar swings back to UMNO/BN.   

https://election.thestar.com.my/selangor.html

And

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabak_Bernam_(federal_constituency)

Wan Saiful Wan Jan understand this well and warns his educated, English-literate, quite often overseas educated, urban, generally pro-Pakatan Harapan middle class cohorts to get off their high horses, out of their ivory towers and out of their Bangsar Bubble echo chamber and experience reality on the ground.

I say this as one of Wan Saiful Wan Jan's educated, English-literate, overseas educated, urban, middle class, born with a silver spoon in my mouth cohorts myself.

To those stupid Pakatoons who will accuse me of being an "UMNO/BN stooge" or a "dedak eater" (chicken feed dater), please be informed that I am an independent thinker, with some brains, who regards myself as part of the incoherent and very much fragmented "Third Force", independent of and not beholden to the Barisan Nasional nor the Pakatan Harapan.

And even now, I still am no fan of Wan Saiful Wan Jan but concur with him on this one point of NGOs in the Bangsar Bubble, albeit from the opposite end of the political spectrum from him.

The Malay Mail article follows below.

malaymail.com

Don’t just promote reform in ‘Bangsar bubble’, Wan Saiful tells NGOs | Malaysia


12-15 minutes


PPBM's Wan Saiful Wan Jan speaks during the G25 forum on Political Financing Reforms in Kuala Lumpur July 21, 2018. ― Picture by Firdaus Latif
PPBM's Wan Saiful Wan Jan speaks during the G25 forum on Political Financing Reforms in Kuala Lumpur July 21, 2018. ― Picture by Firdaus Latif

KUALA LUMPUR, July 21 — Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia political secretary Wan Saiful Wan Jan told civil society groups championing political financing reform to get a dose of reality by visiting villages instead of remaining in upper middle class urban areas.

At a forum on political financing reforms organised by non-profit group G25 at the Bukit Kiara Equestrian & Country Club here, Wan Saiful observed that in Malaysia, civil society tends to preach to converts mainly in urban areas, instead of educating rural Malaysians on why they should not rely on political patronage.

“Politicians are reluctant to change (and be more transparent regarding political funding) because civil society failed to change society. We organise events like this in Bukit Kiara but we do not take it to Pendang or rural areas,” said Wan Saiful.

He said within two months of joining politics, he immediately thought of a “much bigger world than the Bangsar bubble”.

“While we move forward and keep pressure on PH so it remains on track, members of civil society must recognise the elements of hypocrisy in ourselves. We are brave to lobby people in Putrajaya but not in Pendang, Arau,” said Wan Saiful.

He said civil society and politicians must take the political financing reform agenda to the grassroots so that politicians can focus on legislation, instead of being pressured to do “charity work”.     

“The more we are talking ourselves and be happy holding events in Bukit Kiara instead of Pendang, Arau, or even Kerinchi... we will continue to talk to ourselves and no one will understand us since the people (at the) grassroot (level) don’t have access to media like we have,” he added.

“The access to the media means we are loud and we put pressure on the government to change but this is a failure of civil society to understand (the realities) for politicians on the ground,” said the rookie politician who failed to win the Pendang federal seat in Kedah during the last elections.

In his maiden run for office, Wan Saiful came in behind Umno and PAS in the race for Pendang in the 14th general election, polling 14,901 votes to Umno’s 20,728 and to PAS’ 26,536 votes.

Money needed to assist impoverished constituents

Wan Saiful admitted to sharing civil society’s naivete prior to leaving his position as CEO at the Institute of Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) to become a politician, but his experience on the campaign trail has opened up his eyes.

His time in the Malay heartland of Kedah saw impoverished families unable to pay for basic medical needs, leading to family members suffering from infected open wounds and scars, as well as a wife who was forced to cage her mentally ill husband among others.

“I saw an 80-year-old grandmother who lived in a traditional split-level Malay kampung house. Her kitchen is on the ground floor and she lives on the first floor. She is old (and lives alone). She has to crawl up and down the stairs in order to get things from the kitchen.

“When I saw her, she was crying that she only gets RM200 a month from the Welfare Department and was crying, begging me to increase her welfare to RM300 a month if I was elected.

“She just wanted RM300 a month and here in KL, RM300 is lunch for some people,” said Wan Saiful, who had promised during campaigning to find the means to help the impoverished by canvassing companies, businessmen and the public for funds to help those in his constituencies.

Elaborating further, he said this was why many politicians needed a lot of money to service their constituents and it would be even more expensive for someone who lost the race when compared to the victor, since MPs and assemblymen received federal level funding while the losers did not.

BN’s vindictive political culture drove Opposition politicians to secrecy

He explained that under the previous Barisan Nasional (BN) government, things were even worse for the Opposition since the ruling government played vindictive politics and would go after Pakatan Harapan (PH) funders and donors such as Supermax CEO Stanley Thai.

In order to protect their financial resources, then Opposition politicians had no choice but to remain tight-lipped on the source of their fundings.

“When I joined politics, I had to resign from all posts I had, including IDEAS. The reason I resigned was if I stayed in IDEAS, IDEAS would be victimised because politics (in Malaysia) is so vindictive.

“IDEAS is [an] organisation I built for eight years and IDEAS had to distance themselves from me the moment I left. It was painful for me to see, but that’s the reality of Malaysian politics. You take big risk in joining an opposition party (back then).

“The vindictiveness of Umno and BN under Najib’s rule made people like me and my donors really cautious about disclosing who is funding our political work,” he explained, referring to former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

Elections are very expensive

Wan Saiful also said election campaigns itself is an expensive affair since he had spent nearly RM200,000 when he contested the May 9 poll.

He explained that he spent RM50,000 on 5,000 T-shirts, RM50,000 on party flags, RM15,000 on renting five houses for his workers accommodation and storage of campaign materials, RM6,000 to rent two Toyota Hilux for three and a half weeks, and also paying his workers.

“Consider contesting in area where source of income is rubber or rice. You need to appreciate you are pulling them out from daily work they do (to help you campaign).

“Do you know how much scrap rubber sells for? RM1.80 per kg. 100kg = RM180. To get 100 kg, [they] need to work for a week. That’s if they’re lucky. If it rains, they have no income. So if you need their help to put up flags, you need to appreciate the time they took off their work.

“You need to buy them food, drinks, accommodation and appreciate how much they are helping you,” he said. That’s why it’s so expensive to run a campaign. Even after losing you still need people to help you run the show if you are outstation,” Wan Saiful explained.

At the end of his turn during the forum, Wan Saiful invited members of civil society to join him in educating and engaging with rural Malaysians on political financial reforms.

https://www.malaymail.com/s/1654558/dont-just-promote-reform-in-bangsar-bubble-wan-saiful-tells-ngos
------ END -------

Yours truly


Politischeiss
http://politischeiss.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, 13 June 2018

BORING NEWS SINCE THE 14TH GENERAL ELECTIONS

News and commentaries carried by media on both sides of the political spectrum were so exciting in the run up to the 14th general elections on 9May 2018 but after the Pakatan Harapan victory in capturing the federal government, news has gotten very very boring and predictable with reports mostly focused on the number of expensive handbags, jewellery. watches, gold bars and wads of cash in seized from former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's residences, family members' apartments and safe houses and whilst it is perfectly justified to ask where the money came from to purchase all these items, however no solid evidence that crime was involved in the acquisition of these items. Besides that, are reports of new prime minister Tun Dr. Mahathir's cancellation of the High Speed Rail, plans to revive the national car project and so forth.

However I burst out laughing uncontrollably at what writer Joe Najib (not sure whether he is related the former prime minister) wrote in an article published by The Third Force - a Najib supporter.

"Soon enough Guan Eng pergi berak pun invite media nak bagi tau taik dia colour apa."

Transaltion:-

Soon enough Guan Eng (the finance minister) goes take a shit and invites the media to be informed of the colour of his faeces.

Article follows


It’s time for a Third Force – The Third Force

Raggie Jessy

Joe Najib

Without realising, we’re actually seeing the REAL ugly side of our country’s politics exposing itself. Bit by bit. Both sides.

BN is in total disarray. UMNO folks are busy throwing and offering themselves as candidates, creating bigger fractions even at the very top. Semua nak rebut kuasa.

Untuk apa? Tanya diri – untuk apa sebenarnya? Nak tegakkan martabat Melayu? Nak bantu kaum Melayu dalam kehidupan harian mereka? Ataupun ada agenda yang tak semurni tujuan sebenar? Are you collectively moving towards being better? A REAL change? Or are you building yourselves again to be exactly what you were before? Tanya diri baik2.

MCA? MIC? What’s the story? Senyap je. Only WKS is being vocal. Tired of playing second fiddle to the leading component party? What are your plans? Where is the integration? Did your political beliefs and purpose die together with the election results?

Face it. Barisan Nasional needs a serious restructuring. If race-based political parties need to be dissolved, DO IT! Are you too thick-headed to accept that there are always other ways to (genuinely) look after the interest of your respective races without it being overly-political in nature? And that there are ways to do so without offending or sidelining the other races?

Hai, kalau niat tu murni dan ikhlas, banyak alternatif boleh explore.

I’m sure the breakthrough solution is a few think-tank sessions away. Headed by REAL thinkers, not freaking warlords as old as Parameswara.

I see government supporters smiling.
You wait. I’m not done.

We have seen and heard NOTHING but condescending statements from the gazillion press conferences made to date. Soon enough Guan Eng pergi berak pun invite media nak bagi tau taik dia colour apa.

HSR scrapped to HSR postponed?
MRT3 scrapped but instead must add buses?
Jual negara to China but now begging for Japanese Yen??
Country going bankrupt but can afford to give 3 months of tax break?
Cronies coming back to build resorts, airports and ANOTHER car maker?
DSN so convincingly guilty for 1MDB with solid evidence from day one, but now can’t even charge him? While a person that’s already charged in court is made a minister? What, not even going to TRY to investigate further?? Or is that why you chose a certain AG to be appointed, to conveniently drop all charges?

How much more kencing (urine) you want to spray on your supporters and the rakyat?

Dua-dua macam lahanat.

A third force is due.

If there’s a movement out there that’s heading towards an honest, progressive thinking direction, I am offering myself to be part of it. I need to be among people who listen, people I can listen to, people who are genuine in all intents and purposes.

And please, don’t tell me the current government is honest. You must be naive to think that old man has changed. Naive tahap dewa (Naive like an angel).

Don’t like what I have to say?

Too bad. Go follow Cartoon Network.


Yours trully

POLITISCHEISS



Friday, 18 May 2018

IT WAS MORE OF A TUNAMI THAN A TSUNAMI, Y.B. DR. ONG KIAN MING! - Re: (17 May 2018) GE14 – A truly Malaysian Tsunami

Dear Y.B. Dr. Ong Kian Ming,

Thanks for your commentary. However, you seem to ignore economic factors, especially  since the 2013 general elections, which had burdened all Malaysians from the urban centres to the most remote rural villages, the rural and semi-rural areas having delivered the number of seats in parliament in the past, thus enabling Alliance, then BN to rule continuously in the 61 years since Malaya achieved independence.

Prices of goods in the stores had been rising, even before the introduction of the GST on 1 April 2015, which added to the burden, especially upon the lower income group, many of whom were traditionally UMNO/BN voters. I recall a time when a can of Ayam brand tuna costs RM3.60 and today it costs around RM6.00.

I have heard accounts of rural people complaining to Mahathir that where they previously could afford to eat three meals a day, now they can afford only two a day, and they looked towards him winning as enabling relief of their plight.

History testifies that dire economic conditions is the stuff which has driven revolutions - such as the French and Russian Revolutions of February and October 1917.

Dire economic conditions upon the people, also drove the electoral victory of the Fascists in Italy and the National Socialists in Germany, whilst tough economic conditions drove the fall or Marcos, the fall of Soeharto, the Arab Spring uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt, more recently the rise of the populist far right in Europe, the election of Donald Trump and now the Pakatan victory in Malaysia.

Also in Malaysia, the grievances of the FELDA settlers drove many of them to vote against the BN.

Thus despite the redelineation of electoral boundaries which would have favoured the BN under more normal conditions, however in GE14, the pain of economic burdens drove those who traditionally had voted UMNO/BN instead voted Pakatan.

Then, let us not forget what I call the "Mahathir Effect", where Mahathir loyalists amongst UMNO voters would vote BN when Mahathir was in UMNO/BN but now that his party Pribumi is part of Pakatan, they voted Pribumi, or for the candidate of another Pakatan party where Pribumi did not stand.

The Mahathir Effect basically split the UMNO/BN vote, thus enabling Pakatan candidates to win the seats contested, many of them with the largest minority of votes in their constituency, for example Dr. Haniza Talhar of PKR who won Lembah Jaya with the largest minority of votes.

Credit must also be given to Mahathir and Rafizi Ramli for going down and campaigning in UMNO/BN's rural heartlands.

This is in stark contrast to mostly urban and semi-rural based Pakatan politicians, especially from DAP and PKR, who appeal mostly to middle class, urban voters, with issues such as 1MDB, Altantuya, Scorpene submarines,corruption, cronyism, nepotism, press freedom, human rights, meritocracy and so forth which are not top priorities for those struggling to make ends meet.

Thus, rather than being a tsunami, the Pakatan victory in GE14 was very much a "Tunami", since without Tun Dr. Mahathir in Pakatan, you would still be in opposition post GE14 and blaming blackouts at polling stations, 40,000 Bangladeshis being flown in to vote, "ignorant" rural voters who are "easily bought off" with handouts of RM50 and so forth to vote BN.

However, that is not to say that issues such as 1MDB, Altantuya, Scorpene submarines,corruption, cronyism, nepotism, press freedom, human rights, meritocracy and so forth are not important issues. My point has always been that whilst these issues are uppermost in the minds of relatively, comfortably well off, educated, English literate, social media savvy, urban middle class voters, who seemingly have the luxury of time to discuss such issues on social media, in teh tarik and bar talk, however these issues are not top priority amongst the lower income urban and rural voters who had traditionally delivered the winning number of seats in parliament to the BN.

That said, I'm glad that our new Prime Minister Tun.Dr.Mahathir is taking action to address the above issues, though I hope that the now Pakatan federal government, as well as the Pakatan state governments will also address those issues which affect us ordinary citizens on the ground.

You guys and gals are the government now, so you had better give up your "opposition as barking watchdog" mindset and learn to govern well.

CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR VICTORY!

Yours trully

POLITISCHEISS

-----Original Message-----
From: "Dr. Ong Kian Ming, Member of Parliament for P102 Bangi" REDACTED>
Reply-to: Dr. Ong Kian Ming, Member of Parliament for P102 Bangi <REDACTED>
To: IT.SCHEISS
Subject: (17 May 2018) GE14 – A truly Malaysian Tsunami
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 08:50:17 +0000

Media Statement by Dr. Ong Kian Ming, Assistant National Director for Political Education for the DAP and Member of Parliament for P102 Bangi, on the 17th of May, 2018

GE14 – A TRULY MALAYSIAN TSUNAMI
(Image Credit: Amanah Daily)

This media statement can also be read here (link)


When I returned to Malaysia from the United States after the completion of my PhD in 2010, I made a presentation where I said that the opposition was not likely to win GE13 but would take power in GE14. I must admit that even on the eve of polling day on the 9th of May, 2018, I was not 100% confident that Pakatan Harapan would be able to win a majority of parliament seats in GE14. The delimitation exercise which was bulldozed through parliament in March, the expected three corner fights with PAS, the seeming inability for the opposition to break through in Sarawak and the expected fear mongering by the BN among the Malay voters were the main reasons for my doubts.

What Najib and the BN did not count on was the creation of a Malaysian Tsunami which, to their utter shock and horror, swept the BN out of office, not just at the federal level but also in all of the states with the exception of Perlis and Pahang.[1]

BN’s share of the popular vote in Malaysia (including Sabah and Sarawak) nosedived by 12.8%, from 46.7% in GE2013 to 33.9% in GE2018 (Table 1 above). To put this figure into context, BN’s vote share in GE2018 was far lower than the 46.2% of the popular vote it (contesting as the Alliance Coalition) managed to win in Peninsular Malaysia in the 1969 general elections, which was already considered a disastrous performance.


Table 1: Share of and Change in Share of Popular Vote in Malaysia (GE2013 vs GE2018)
Pakatan Harapan emerged as the largest coalition with 48.3% of the popular vote. Some analysts have used the fact that PH failed to win a majority of votes to say that PH does not command the support of a majority of supporters in Malaysia. These same analysts also try to lump together the total support for BN and PAS to say that more than 50% of the voters did not support PH in GE2018. This interpretation totally misses the mark. The results of GE2018 was all about the backlash against the BN. 65% of voters voted AGAINST the BN and threw their support behind parties that were NOT the BN. Almost two thirds of voters in the country voted AGAINST the BN because that is how badly they wanted BN out of power at the federal and state levels.

The anti-BN swing was felt in ALL of the states in Malaysia. The largest swing against the BN occurred in Kedah where support for the BN fell by 19.8% from 49.8% in GE2013 to 30% in GE2018. Double digit swings against the BN were also experienced in Selangor, Johor, Perlis, Melaka, Negeri Sembilan, Sabah, Wilayah Persekutuan (KL & Putrajaya), Perak and Terengganu. (Figure 2 below)

In fact, the only state where the BN won more than 50% of the popular vote was in Sarawak, with 52.7% of the popular vote. (Table 2 below)
Figure 1: Change in BN support (Parliament) GE2013 to 2018
Table 2: Change in BN support (Parliament) GE2013 to 2018
Unlike in GE2013 where Malay support for the BN actually increased slightly compared to GE2008, there is no question that the Malay voters abandoned the BN in unprecedented numbers. Even many of the civil servants voted against the BN. Tengku Adnan, the former Minister for the Federal Territories, won his Putrajaya seat with only 49.5% of the popular vote in GE2018. This was a seat which he won comfortably in GE2013 with almost 70% of the popular vote.

There is strong evidence to suggest that even the police and army voters abandoned the BN in significant numbers. The four parliament seats with more than 10,000 early voters (mostly police and army voters) were all won by Pakatan Harapan (Table 3 below). Two of these seats – Setiawangsa and Tangga Batu – were won by the BN in 2013. The parliament seat of Lumut was gerrymandered to make it easier for UMNO to win back this seat. 10,000 police voters were moved into the Lembah Pantai parliament seat. Without a significant number of police and army voters NOT supporting the BN (either voting for PAS, PH, spoiling their votes or not casting their vote), PH would not have been able to win these parliament seats.
Table 3: Parliament seats with more than 10,000 early voters all of which were won by PH (GE2018)
In my own constituency of P102 Bangi, out of the 1305 postal votes which were cast (mostly army votes), 471 went to the PAS candidate (36.1%), 409 went to the myself, the PH candidate, (31.1%) and only 299 went to the BN candidate (22.9%). I was shocked when I saw these results. I won’t be surprised if the results in many of the other seats with a high number of postal and early voters also shows that a significant proportion of the army and police votes were cast NOT in support of the BN.

Pakatan Harapan performed very well in the ethnically mixed or ‘heterogeneous’ parliament seats. These are seats where no one race comprises more than 70% of the electorate. Out of the 83 mixed parliament seats, Pakatan Harapan won 73 or 88% with BN winning the remaining 10 (UMNO 7, MIC 2 and MCA 1). PAS did not win a single ethnically mixed parliament seat. These constituencies have become and will become increasingly important in Malaysia’s electoral landscape with increasing migration to urban areas. If the constituency delimitation were done fairly, such mixed seats would easily comprise 60% to 70% of total parliament seats in Peninsular Malaysia. Only a coalition with the ability to win the support of all the ethnic groups can hope to win such seats.

Last but not least, this Malaysian tsunami could not have happened without the voters in Sabah and Sarawak. While I was confident that Warisan together with DAP and PKR would make headway in Sabah, I did not imagine that PH together with Warisan would win 14 out of 26 parliament seats as well as 29 out of 60 state seats in Sabah.[2] What was more unexpected was the fact that the opposition would capture 12 out of 31 parliament seats in Sarawak[3] including a few semi-rural and rural seats such as Mas Gasing, Puncak Borneo, Saratok and Selangau.

With urban and rural voters, Malay and non-Malay voters, Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysian voters, the civil service, the police and the army all rejecting the BN in record numbers, history was made and for the first time in 61 years, Malaysia has a new federal government. The question now is whether Pakatan Harapan can hold on to these gains and expand our influence to places where we performed poorly in notably Kelantan and Terengganu. But that is for another statement. For now, the focus for PH is to deliver on our manifesto promises and show that voters that we are a government which can truly deliver for the people.  












Copyright © 2018 Democratic Action Party, All rights reserved.